Task Force Virtual Mobility

Virtual Mobility and Physical Mobility are two different forms within one scheme of mobility. Hence, they have to be conceived as different educational concepts. Both of them have their own promising future in higher education. Neither is inferior to the other. PM and VM each has its own profile and legitimacy. Furthermore, they complement and reinforce each other in various ways, but virtual mobility is sometimes the easiest or only solution for international mobility.

The core potentials of VM can be summarized in 4 paradigmatic types as follows:

1. VM in the framework of an international learning experience through communication and hence an intercultural exchange , created by two or more universities (comparable with an intensive programme in the Erasmus programme) and to be realised by a discussion group about a specific course topic, a virtual seminar, a learning community about a scientific topic or domain. Staff and students of different institutions would always be involved. A virtual learning experience can vary in time and can eventually be combined with a short period of PM. [now possible by e-learning means]
   
   
2. VM by students through choosing one or more courses from a guest institution . This might range from single course to a full academic year. The normal Erasmus instruments (learning agreements, course catalogues, ECTS, transfer of records and grading scales are applicable). [like ERASMUS, based on individual wishes and decision]
   
   
3. VM in the framework of jointly developed and offered courses or joint study programmes , eventually leading to joint certificates or degrees [common course, initiated and framed by institutions]
   
   
4. VM in the framework of continuing professional training and development for people in employment [this might involve a common scheme between university and a company; but other stakeholders might be involved].
   

These four types allow for acquiring "international experience" and "intercultural competence" through "international socialization" as envisaged in the Bologna process.

But it is important to remember that there exist barriers which might hinder VM from coming into effect and becoming the accepted and preferred option. Some main barriers to virtual mobility can be identified:

•  Language problems
•  Interoperability
•  Cultural problems

However, these barriers do not work in the same way for the different types of VM mentioned.

It was decided in the Rectors meeting of October 2003 to construct a Task Force on virtual mobility that investigates the characteristics, opportunities, favorable conditions and barriers of virtual mobility. The working group will develop an operational framework for virtual mobility that is based on bilateral co-operations between the universities (programme and institutional level).

The FernUni in Germany is heading this Task Force.